99% of Meme Coin Trades Are Doomed to Rekt, Whales Are the Real Winners
Original Title: If you are still in the memecoin trenches, pivot to Casino.
Original Author: Foxi (DeFi / AI)
Original Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow

My Meme trading account is currently down by -60%. Am I a terrible trader? Yes, indeed I am. But it's not just due to bad decisions; I would rather believe I am not worse than an average gambler. So, where exactly is the problem? Inspired by @0xngmi's data (who pointed out that the returns from playing Memecoin are even worse than a casino), I decided to delve deeper to see what the root of the issue is.
Firstly, I Admit: I Am a Terrible Meme Trader
Like many newcomers, I've been led by the market hype and emotions, chasing highs, selling lows, frequent trading leading to slippage, and even unknowingly handing money to insider traders in the market.
While this is not my first time in the cryptocurrency market, this experience made me feel like I was playing an unfair game. Worse still, the rules of this game seem to be constantly changing and always favoring those with more information.
@0xngmi calculated the comparison between the expected return (EV) of playing roulette in a casino and the expected return of Memecoin speculation (based solely on transaction fees).

(Original image from @0xngmi, translated by Deep Tide TechFlow)
· The fee for small trades is 2.5%, while Raydium's fee is 0.25%. A speculation requires two transactions, so the fee must be multiplied by 2.
· Moonshot's default slippage is set at 5%, taking half of this as an estimate for average sandwich attacks.
· It is difficult to estimate precisely due to significant differences between tokens, assuming a 2.5% cost for each transaction.
This got me thinking: How does Meme speculation compare to actual gambling? Are their odds equally terrible? Or even worse? More importantly, are Meme traders merely casino gamblers disguised as "investors," or are there more complex, more insidious mechanisms at play behind the scenes? According to @0xngmi's analysis, putting money into a casino seems to be a wiser choice than playing with Memes.
True Odds: Memecoin vs. Casino
We need to talk about Expected Value (EV), which is a core concept in both gambling and trading. It tells us, on average, how much money you can expect to win or lose with each bet over time.
Casino games have a kind of "fair unfairness" mathematically. Over the long run, you can always predict how much you will lose. Let's take a closer look:

(Original image by Foxi (DeFi / AI), compiled by Deep Tide TechFlow)
In traditional gambling, the casino profits in a slow and predictable manner. Whether it's each spin of the roulette wheel or each pull of the slot machine's lever, it follows a known probability model. For example, in American roulette, if you bet on red, you have a 47.37% chance of winning and a 52.63% chance of losing. Over time, the casino always wins, but it does not cheat—it simply leverages probability to its advantage. However, to protect gamblers, some jurisdictions mandate a minimum return percentage. For instance, in Ontario, the RTP (Return to Player) of a slot machine must be at least 85%, meaning the casino's edge (i.e., house edge) is at most 15%.
Why 99% of People Lose Money in Memecoin Trading
Unlike the casino, Memecoin trading appears to be a "game of opportunity," but the issue is that you don't even know who the real players are. While the Memecoin market doesn't have a clear "House Edge," through transaction fees, slippage, insider trading, and market manipulation, your funds will still be slowly eroded. Moreover, this erosion is often insidious and challenging to quantify.
Here are the three main reasons that lead to widespread losses among Memecoin investors:
· Transaction Fee
· Slippage
· Market Manipulation
1. Transaction Fee: The Hidden "Maker's Fee"
Every transaction incurs a fee. Whether you are on a centralized exchange (CEX, such as @bitgetglobal or @MEXC_Official), a decentralized exchange (DEX, such as @RaydiumProtocol), or using a trading bot (like @gmgnai, which most people are using), these fees will gradually erode your profits.
CEX Fee: Approximately 0.1% per transaction (buying + selling = 0.2% round-trip fee)
DEX Fee: Approximately 0.3% per transaction, plus Gas fees (each transaction could cost $5-$50+)
Trading Bot Fee: Approximately 1% per transaction, plus priority fees (which could be 4 times the regular DEX fee)
Memecoin Tax: Some projects extract 5%-10% from each transaction as part of a redistribution or burn mechanism. For example, @aipool_tee charges a 10% fee on sell transactions.
These trading bots are earning substantial amounts from retail users. Although the number of people trading Memes has decreased as of now (February 17), daily revenue can still exceed $700,000.
On the surface, 0.2%-1% transaction fees may not seem high, but when you trade frequently every day, these fees quickly add up. Making 10 trades in a day could potentially consume 2%-6% of your principal, which is even more severe than losses from playing European roulette.
2. Slippage (MEV Cost)
Slippage refers to the difference between the expected price of a trade and the actual execution price due to market fluctuations. In Memecoin trading, slippage is particularly severe, especially in cases of low liquidity or high market volatility.
· Example: You try to buy a Memecoin with $100, but due to insufficient liquidity, you actually receive tokens worth $95, resulting in a 5% loss.
· When selling, a similar situation occurs. You plan to sell for $200, but slippage causes you to only receive $190.
· Total slippage loss: approximately 10% of the round-trip transaction cost.

@0xngmi mentioned that about 2.5% of the transaction fee is consumed due to MEV (Sandwich Attack cost), and on the BNB Chain, this cost could be over 5%, attributed to its inferior infrastructure.
A more robust blockchain infrastructure can significantly reduce MEV costs. This is also why many believe Solana is superior to the BNB Chain (I fully agree on this). If @cz_binance wants to promote Meme culture on the BNB Chain, the primary task should be to reduce MEV costs, thereby increasing Memecoin players' expected value (EV).
However, even on Solana, a 2.5%-5% MEV cost is still more severe than losses in a casino game. If you find the house edge on a slot machine to be as high as 10%, you might be furious. But in the Memecoin market, this is not even the worst part.
3. Insider Trading and Market Manipulation
On this point, little needs to be said. Unlike a casino, which has clear rules, the Meme market is entirely skewed towards insiders. No regulation can prevent team wallets, developers, or influencers from conducting "Pump and Dump" schemes to exploit retail traders. For example, the following cases:
· $LIBRA: Took off with tokens worth over $107 million
· $MELANIA: Is it related to Meteroa?
· $CAR: Africa Rugged event
· $CUBA: Another Country's Rugged Event
· $GANG: @mrpunkdoteth Cash Out $10 Million via Fans
· $Broccoli: Manipulated by Scammers and Insiders for Profit
These are just the tip of the iceberg. It can be said that unless you are an insider like @frankdegods, you have virtually no advantage to participate in these Memecoins. In a casino, at least you know what the house edge is, while in the Memecoin market, you don't even know who the house is, but they are definitely taking your money.
Final Comparison: Memecoin Speculation vs. Gambling Expectation Value (EV)

Casino games will slowly drain your funds over time, while Memecoin speculation is much more brutal. One wrong trade could wipe out weeks of gains in an instant. The only motivation to keep participating is the occasional 100x return. However, the actual likelihood of achieving a 100x return is approximately 1/25,000, even lower than the odds of winning the lottery.
People often believe they are "special" or "skilled" (yes, I'm that self-delusional person), but ultimately, they get rekt.
What makes Memecoin not like gambling is that it gives people a sense of illusory control—a misconception that one can make money through research, timing, and skill. Indeed, some traders can profit, but they are the minority, much like professional poker players. The majority of traders, like most gamblers, will ultimately lose.
Advice to On-Chain
If you want to attract users and increase on-chain transaction volume, make sure traders' MEV costs are low enough, and try to reduce transaction fees through cooperation or fund subsidies. Casinos can operate in the long run because gamblers are willing to continue participating.
Advice to Investors
If you are engaging in Memecoin speculation, remember, the house always wins. And you will only realize who the house is when it's too late. If you find yourself unable to disengage, you may already be in a state of gambling addiction.
You may also like

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds

See “Buy Walls” & “Sell Walls” Instantly: WEEX Launches the Depth Chart for Smarter Trades

What Is Quick Trade on WEEX? 2 Ways WEEX Ends Chart-Panel Jumping

Morning News | Five major virtual asset platforms in South Korea have experienced 57 incidents of hacking and system failures in six years; Grayscale submits registration application for Canton ETF

Should we escape the peak? The principle of the tail-end market in the stock market

RootData: May 2026 Cryptocurrency Exchange Transparency Research Report

Founder of Baixing.com: My Experience with Claude Code in Fourteen Points
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching
Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.
Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.
Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery
Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.




