CoinGlass: 2026 Q1 Cryptocurrency Market Share Research Report
Source: CoinGlass
1. Executive Summary and Key Findings
In Q1 2026, the overall cryptocurrency market remained highly active, but the trading volume gradually declined from the peak in January. The total spot market transaction volume in Q1 was approximately $19.4 trillion, the derivative market transaction volume was approximately $18.63 trillion, totaling around $20.57 trillion, with a derivative-to-spot trading ratio of about 9.6. Structurally, market activity still mainly concentrated in the derivative market, with a relatively larger contraction in spot trading volume.
In terms of key indicators, Binance continued to maintain an industry-leading position. The derivative trading volume was about $4.90 trillion, accounting for approximately 34.9% in Top 10 exchanges' terms; average daily open interest was around $239 billion, accounting for approximately 29.9%; user asset deposits were about $152.9 billion, representing around 73.5% in major CEX terms. Compared to the second-place, Binance's derivative trading volume is about 2.2 times that of OKX, average OI is about 2.2 times that of Bybit, and user asset scale is about 9.6 times that of OKX. The data reflects that Binance's leadership is not concentrated in a single dimension but is reflected in trading, open interest, liquidity, and fund retention simultaneously.
Looking at the Top 5 competitive landscape, the market has formed a relatively clear hierarchical structure. In terms of derivative trading volume, Binance, OKX, Bybit, Gate, and Bitget are the top five, with Bybit and Gate having similar volumes, OKX still being the platform closest to Binance in terms of centralized platforms; in terms of open interest, the ranking of the second-tier has changed to Bybit, Gate, OKX, Bitget. In terms of user asset deposits, after Binance, only OKX has remained above the tens of billions of dollars level, while Gate, Bitget, and Bybit are in the $5 billion to $7 billion range. Overall, internal competition within the Top 5 is relatively sufficient, but there is still a considerable gap between the leading platforms and the following tiers.
2. Spot and Derivative Trading Volume
2.1 Market-Wide Monthly Trading Volume Overview
In Q1 2026, the total cryptocurrency trading volume for the entire market (spot + derivative) was approximately $20.57 trillion, with spot trading around $1.94 trillion and derivative trading around $18.63 trillion. Looking at the monthly distribution, the total trading volume was highest in January (spot $704.7 billion + derivative $6.73 trillion), slightly declined in February, and further contracted to a quarterly low in March. This trend corresponds to the cautious sentiment in the global macro environment at the same time, as the market, after experiencing a sharp deleveraging in Q4 2025, has not fully restored its risk appetite.
The average daily trading volume in the spot market is around $218 billion, while the average daily trading volume in the derivatives market is around $2,093 billion. The derivatives-to-spot ratio remained stable at around 9.6x in Q1, slightly higher than the full-year 2025 average. This indicates that during market adjustment phases, traders prefer to hedge and engage in short-term speculation through derivatives rather than directional allocation in the spot market.


2.2 Spot Trading Volume and Market Share
In Q1, Binance's total spot market trading volume was around $6,399 billion, with a corresponding average daily trading volume of $71.9 billion, representing a market share of approximately 34.3% according to the Top 10 exchange calculation methodology. Looking at the monthly trend, Binance's share in the Spot Top 10 exchanges remained relatively stable: 34.0% in January 2026, 33.7% in February, and a rebound to 35.4% in March. Despite the market contracting from $7,047 billion in January to $5,420 billion in March, a 23% decrease, Binance's share slightly increased. This indicates that while the overall spot market declined, liquidity continued to concentrate on a few top platforms.
Expanding the competitive landscape to the Top 5, the spot market's distribution is noticeably more diversified compared to the derivatives market. The top five platforms in cumulative spot trading volume in Q1 were Binance, Gate, Bybit, Coinbase, and OKX, with corresponding volumes of around $6,399 billion, $2,014 billion, $1,869 billion, $1,677 billion, and $1,627 billion, respectively. Calculated based on the entire market scope, excluding Binance, the market share of the other four platforms is roughly distributed in the 8% to 10% range. This means that Binance's leadership in the spot market is evident, but compared to the derivatives market, the distribution of the second tier of the spot market is more balanced, and the competition is more diversified.

2.3 Derivatives Trading Volume and Market Share
In Q1, Binance's total derivatives market trading volume was approximately $4.90 trillion, with an average daily trading volume of $550 billion. Under the Top 10 exchange calculation, Binance maintained the top position with a 34.9% share, surpassing the combined volume of second-placed OKX ($2.19 trillion) and third-placed Bybit ($1.49 trillion).
From a monthly trend perspective, Binance's trading volume share in the Derivatives Top 10 exchanges has remained relatively stable: 33.2% in January 2026, increased to 35.8% in February, and maintained at 35.7% in March. The trajectory of recovery after this downturn is consistent with the process where market liquidity returned to top platforms after the deleveraging impact in Q4 2025. In other words, at the beginning of the quarter, trading volume among platforms briefly diverged, but as the market gradually stabilized, liquidity continued to flow back to platforms with higher depth and stronger execution efficiency. Binance demonstrated a stronger capacity to handle this round of recovery.
OKX is currently the centralized platform closest to Binance, but its trading volume is still only about 45% of Binance's; Bybit and Gate have similar volumes, forming the second echelon; although Bitget ranks in the top five, there is a noticeable gap between it and the top four. In relative terms, Binance's derivatives trading volume is about 3.3 times that of Bybit, 3.4 times that of Gate, and 5.5 times that of Bitget.

2.4 Competitive Landscape Comparison
If we observe spot and derivatives markets within the same framework, we can see a clear difference in the competitive landscape between the two market types. In the spot market, Binance remains in the lead, but the second echelon is jointly formed by Gate, Bybit, Coinbase, and OKX, with relatively close shares; in the derivatives market, Binance's lead is more significant, and a certain hierarchy has also formed between the second-placed OKX and the third and fourth places. Thus, it is evident that Binance's leadership in the derivatives market is more concentrated, while the spot market exhibits a "top first, second echelon dispersed" structure.
From a platform positioning perspective, OKX consistently ranks second in derivatives trading volume, being the closest challenger to Binance; the competitive relationship between Bybit and Gate is closer to the same level, with the former having strong participation among global active traders and the latter maintaining a high presence in terms of trading volume and open interest. Platforms ranking beyond the Top 5 such as BingX, LBank, WhiteBIT, Coinbase, and Hyperliquid continue to sustain significant trading activity; however, they still lag behind the top five platforms in overall volume.
Of note is the entrance of decentralized derivatives platforms into the mainstream comparative view. Hyperliquid's Q1 derivative trading volume was approximately $492.7 billion, placing it in the top ten, and reaching an average open interest level of around $6 billion. This indicates that on-chain derivatives are no longer just a marginal supplement but are beginning to form actual competition in localized markets. However, in terms of current scale, their overall volume is still significantly lower than that of leading centralized platforms like Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.
III. Derivative Holdings
3.1 Total Market Contract Holdings Trend
In Q1 2026, the average daily Open Interest (OI) of the total derivatives market was around $117.2 billion. The peak within the quarter occurred on January 15th, reaching around $152.5 billion. Looking at the monthly trend, the average daily OI in January was around $141.1 billion, sharply dropping to $102.6 billion in February, a decrease of about 27%, and slightly recovering to $106.0 billion in March.
3.2 OI Share and Ranking Changes
In Q1, Binance's average OI was around $23.9 billion, accounting for approximately 29.9% of the Top 10 exchanges, ranking first. The second to fifth positions were held by Bybit, Gate, OKX, and Bitget, with average OIs of around $11.0 billion, $10.8 billion, $6.8 billion, and $6.4 billion, respectively. Binance's average OI was about 2.2 times that of Bybit, 2.2 times that of Gate, 3.5 times that of OKX, and 3.7 times that of Bitget, showing a clear lead.
Binance's OI share remained in the 20%-21% range (total market) throughout the quarter, with limited fluctuations, indicating its relatively stable market position in terms of holdings. Of more significance, Binance's peak OI was around $32.1 billion, approximately 2.2 times Bybit's peak ($14.5 billion), demonstrating Binance's ability to attract more positions during intensified market fluctuations.

3.3 Market Structure Analysis
The holding market structure exhibits characteristics different from trading volume. In terms of trading volume, Binance leads by over 19 percentage points compared to the second-place; however, in OI terms, the gaps between Binance (29.9%), Bybit (13.8%), Gate (13.4%), OKX (8.5%) have narrowed. This reflects that different platforms have their respective competitive advantages in attracting long-term holdings.
The scale of Hyperliquid's holdings deserves special attention. Its average daily OI is around $6.0 billion, with a peak close to $9.7 billion, approaching Bitget and surpassing platforms like WhiteBIT, and BingX. The enhancement of on-chain platforms in terms of holdings indicates a continuously strengthening appeal in high-leverage and strategic trading. In the short term, this trend is not yet sufficient to challenge Binance's leading position. Still, for the second-tier platforms, the entry of on-chain competitors is increasing the complexity of future share competition. As a decentralized derivative protocol, the rapid growth of its holdings further validates the assessment in the 2025 report regarding the "shift of decentralized derivatives from conceptual validation to actual market share competition."
4. Liquidity Depth
This chapter's data is based on order book snapshot data, comparing the major platforms' ±1% bid-ask depth in the BTC and ETH spot and derivatives markets. Compared to trading volume and open interest, depth more directly reflects a platform's true capacity to handle large transactions, making it a key metric for determining whether the leading platforms' "quality over volume" thesis holds.

4.1 BTC Market Depth
In the BTC derivatives market, Binance, OKX, and Bybit have an average ±1% bid-ask depth of approximately $284 million, $160 million, and $76.55 million, respectively. Binance is about 1.8 times that of OKX and 3.7 times that of Bybit, maintaining a significant lead. From an institutional trading perspective, this means that Binance can accommodate larger-scale orders in the BTC derivatives market without disproportionately increasing the impact cost, making its liquidity advantage directly executable.
In the BTC spot market, Binance, Bybit, and OKX have an average ±1% bid-ask depth of approximately $37.54 million, $26.82 million, and $20.18 million, respectively. Unlike the derivatives market, Bybit, not OKX, holds the second position in BTC spot, but Binance still leads Bybit by about 40% and OKX by about 86%. This indicates that Binance is in the first position in both the BTC spot and derivatives markets' two core liquidity pools, while the second-place platform rotates between different sub-markets.
4.2 ETH Market Depth
In the ETH derivatives market, Binance, OKX, and Bybit have an average ±1% bid-ask depth of approximately $139 million, $117 million, and $90.15 million, respectively. Compared to the BTC derivatives market, the competition in the ETH derivatives market is closer, with OKX narrowing the gap with Binance to about 16%, and Bybit's gap with Binance at about 35%. Nevertheless, Binance still maintains the lead, indicating that its leadership exists not only in BTC but also extends to the ETH derivatives market.
In the ETH spot market, Binance, Bybit, and OKX have an average ±1% bid-ask depth of approximately $16.84 million, $11.58 million, and $10.57 million, respectively. Similar to the BTC spot market, Bybit holds the second position, but Binance leads Bybit by about 45% and OKX by about 59%. Looking at the results, Binance ranks first in all four core sub-markets, while the second position alternates between OKX and Bybit, further illustrating that Binance's advantage is more comprehensive, rather than focused on a specific asset or market.
4.3 Relationship Between Depth and Trade Volume
From a performance perspective, depth is often a better measure of a platform's true liquidity quality than volume. Q1 data shows that Binance not only leads in spot and derivative trading volumes but also has the best depth in the primary BTC and ETH trading scenes. OKX is more competitive in contract depth, Bybit's spot depth is closer to the top, but currently, no platform exerts comprehensive pressure on Binance in all four core sub-markets simultaneously, indicating that Binance's leadership has strong structural stability.
Five, User Asset Immobilization
5.1 Asset Reserve Scale and Trend of Change
In Q1 2026, Binance's average daily custody assets were approximately $152.9 billion, accounting for about 73.5% of the share among the Top 10 exchanges. This ratio is much higher than Binance's market share in trading volume (about 34.9%) and holdings (about 29.9%), showing that Binance's concentration of funds at the custody level is significantly higher than at the trading activity level. For an exchange, user asset immobilization is usually related to brand trust, product ecosystem, on-chain/off-chain fund convenience, and multi-business cross-usage scenarios, making this metric more reflective of the platform's comprehensive competitive position in the medium to long term.
Looking at the monthly trend, Binance's custody assets experienced a decline followed by stability in Q1. In January, the daily average was around $172.7 billion, the quarterly peak, reflecting capital inflows at the beginning of the year under market optimism. In February, it dropped to around $136.4 billion, a decrease of about 21%, consistent with the declining trend of OI during the same period. In March, it slightly rebounded to around $147.8 billion, indicating that the trend of capital outflows has basically stabilized. The peak within the quarter occurred on January 15th, at around $182.1 billion.
The top 5 platforms are Binance, OKX, Gate, Bitget, and Bybit, with average user assets of approximately $152.9 billion, $15.9 billion, $6.8 billion, $6.7 billion, and $5.6 billion, respectively. This means that under the main CEX caliber, only OKX maintains a level above $10 billion, while platforms ranked third to fifth are concentrated in the range of $5 billion to $7 billion, showing an overall pattern of "significant lead by the first, followed by the second, and the rest relatively close."

5.2 Comparison of Mainstream CEX Asset Stockpile
The market concentration of user asset stockpiles is much higher than that of trading volume and holdings. Among the Top 10 exchanges, Binance dominates with $152.9 billion, while the second-place OKX has a daily average of around $15.9 billion, only one-tenth of Binance's. The third to fifth places are Gate ($6.8 billion), Bitget ($6.7 billion), and Bybit ($5.6 billion) respectively. The three have similar volumes but are orders of magnitude smaller than Binance—Binance's asset size is approximately 8 times the sum of these three. The average user assets on Binance are about 9.6 times that of OKX, 22.4 times that of Gate, 22.9 times that of Bitget, and 27.1 times that of Bybit. Compared to its leading position in derivatives trading volume and OI dimensions, Binance's lead in asset stockpiling is even greater. This means that Binance's market position is not only reflected in trading activity but also in the platform preference for long-term fund detention. For the industry's competitive landscape, these types of leadership positions usually have higher stability and are harder to replicate in the short term. This extremely concentrated distribution pattern implies that Binance has actually assumed a role similar to "systemic infrastructure" at the user fund custody level, and its operations and compliance status have an amplifying effect on the overall stability of the crypto market.
In the second tier, HTX ($5.0 billion), MEXC ($4.8 billion), Deribit ($4.1 billion), KuCoin ($3.7 billion), Crypto.com ($2.4 billion) make up the long tail.
Six, Comprehensive Analysis and Outlook
By synthesizing data from four dimensions: trading volume, holdings, liquidity depth, and user asset stockpiling, the following core judgments can be made:
First, Binance's market leadership is comprehensive and solid. Binance ranks first in all core dimensions: derivative trading volume of around $4.9 trillion (Top 10 share of 34.9%), daily average OI of $23.9 billion (share of 29.9%), BTC contract depth of $2.84 billion (share of 54.6%), and user assets of $152.9 billion (share of 73.5%). More importantly, Binance's lead in liquidity depth and asset custody dimensions is much greater than the trading volume dimension, meaning its position as the core infrastructure of the cryptocurrency market is more robust than implied by simple trading volume rankings.
Second, the competitive landscape of the derivatives market is being reshaped. OKX is currently the platform closest to Binance, primarily reflected in derivative trading volume and contract depth; Bybit is characterized by relatively balanced trading volume, holdings, and spot liquidity performance; Gate maintains a high presence in derivative trading and OI dimensions, but relatively weak asset stockpiling; Bitget is an important platform in the second tier, maintaining top five positions in derivative trading volume and holdings dimensions. Meanwhile, the derivatives market traditionally dominated by a few leading CEXs is being simultaneously challenged by two forces: one end is the compliance institution channel represented by CME, and the other end is the decentralized protocol represented by Hyperliquid. The former mainly attracts hedging and basis trading demand, while the latter attracts some high-frequency and strategic traders with its anti-censorship, composability, and 24/7 characteristics.
Third, the overall market is moving forward in a cautious recovery. The trading volume in Q1 contracted month by month, and the OI stabilized after retreating from its high level, overall reflecting the characteristics of the market's recovery period after the extreme event in Q4 2025. Entering Q2, key variables to watch include: the clarification of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy path, changes in BTC spot ETF fund flows, and the progress of regulatory frameworks in major jurisdictions.
This article is a contributed piece and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.
